Claims

Practicing retrieval of some portions of an educational text can enhance retention of related nontested portions (retrieval-induced facilitation), but not when relational encoding is disrupted

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The chapter reports, citing Chan et al. (2006), that short-answer retrieval practice on educational texts enhanced later performance on both tested and nontested material relative to no retrieval practice. → Karpicke 2017 q2 i? The chapter reports, citing Chan (2010), that these retrieval-induced facilitation effects persist after delays of 1 day and 1 week. → Karpicke 2017 (2) q2 i? The chapter reports, citing Chan (2009), that with randomized sentence order retrieval practice still enhanced tested portions but no longer produced facilitation for nontested material. → Karpicke 2017 (3)

Evidence

Karpicke 2017

Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-Based Learning: A Decade of Progress. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, 2nd edition, Volume 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9

q2 · i? · review · r3

The chapter reports Chan et al. (2006), whose initial questions covered only some portions of texts: "practicing retrieval enhanced performance on both the tested and nontested material".

"On a later criterial test, practicing retrieval enhanced performance on both the tested and nontested material, relative to control conditions that did not practice retrieval."

Karpicke 2017 (2)

Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-Based Learning: A Decade of Progress. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, 2nd edition, Volume 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9

q2 · i? · review · r3

The chapter reports Chan (2010), showing that "these transfer effects persist after delays of 1 day and 1 week".

"Chan et al. called this phenomenon retrieval-induced facilitation (see also Little et al., 2011 ). Importantly, Chan (2010) showed that these transfer effects persist after delays of 1 day and 1 week."

Karpicke 2017 (3)

Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-Based Learning: A Decade of Progress. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, 2nd edition, Volume 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9

q2 · i? · review · r3

The chapter reports Chan (2009), where randomizing sentence order disrupted relational encoding: "there was no longer a retrieval-induced facil- itation effect for nontested material".

"For these texts, retrieval practice enhanced subsequent retention for tested portions of the material, but there was no longer a retrieval-induced facil- itation effect for nontested material."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id retrieval-induced-facilitation-of-nontested-text-material-requires-relational-encoding
title Practicing retrieval of some portions of an educational text can enhance retention of related nontested portions (retrieval-induced facilitation), but not when relational encoding is disrupted
description Practicing retrieval of some portions of an educational text can enhance retention of related nontested portions (retrieval-induced facilitation), but not when relational encoding is disrupted
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2017
generated by claude/unspecified on 2026-09-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 3 — karpicke-2017, karpicke-2017-2, karpicke-2017-3

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.