Claims

Houston students made significantly greater math growth than the state average in 2018-19, but reading growth was not significantly different

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2025: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Houston students overall gained 0.06 standard deviations (32 days of learning) more than the state average in math, significant at p < 0.01, while reading growth of 0.01 SD (2 days) was not significant. → CREDO 2022

Evidence

CREDO 2022

CREDO. (2022). City Study 2022: Houston. https://credo.stanford.edu

q2 · i? · associational · r?

Overall Houston results table for 2018-19, benchmarking Houston growth to state average growth accounting for student characteristics. Reading shows "0.01 2" (not significant) and math shows "0.06** 32**", significant at p < 0.01.

"H o u s t o n O v e r a l l 2 0 1 8- 19 0.01 2 0.06** 32**"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id houston-overall-growth-2018-19-math-positive-reading-null
title Houston students made significantly greater math growth than the state average in 2018-19, but reading growth was not significantly different
description Houston students made significantly greater math growth than the state average in 2018-19, but reading growth was not significantly different
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
recheck_by 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — credo-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.