Incidental focus on form via recasting during jigsaw retelling tasks improves EFL learners' overall grammatical accuracy¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The experimental group receiving incidental focus on form via recasting significantly outperformed the control group on overall grammatical accuracy as measured by a 50-item grammatical judgment test. → Abdollahzadeh 2015
Evidence¶
Abdollahzadeh 2015¶
Abdollahzadeh, S. (2015). The Effect of Incidental Focus on Form on EFL Learners’ Grammatical Accuracy. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.5p.40
q3 · i? · causal · r1
A quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test control group study of 80 female EFL learners aged 16-18 found that the experimental group, which received recast feedback during jigsaw retelling tasks over eight sessions, showed a "positive effect of incidental focus on form on grammatical accuracy of L2 learners" compared to the control group, which received no feedback.
"The results at the end supported the hypotheses of the study and positive effect of incidental focus on form on grammatical accuracy of L2 learners."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Incidental focus on form has a greater effect on the accuracy of articles than on pronouns and tenses — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Incidental focus on form improves accuracy of pronouns and tenses — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Incidental focus on form has no effect on the accuracy of prepositions — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Purely meaning-focused activity without form-focused treatment did not lead learners to improve oral accuracy — related
- Metalinguistic feedback and recasts, but not clarification requests, significantly improve Iranian EFL learners' wh-question performance on an immediate post-test — related
- Corrective feedback on second-language errors has a significant effect on L2 development that is maintained on delayed tests — a broader claim this one bears on
- Prompts were overall more effective than recasts as corrective feedback for L2 grammar learning — related
- Recasts on simple past tense errors outperform no feedback on oral accuracy in the final session (p = .040) — related
- Mini-game-supported controlled L2 practice improves accuracy and response times on a timed grammaticality judgment test relative to a control group — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.