Claims

Form two physics students taught through intensive practical activities significantly outperformed students taught by conventional lecture-based methods on a post-test of chosen topics

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The experimental group's post-test mean score of 53.0 was significantly higher than the control group's 29.5 (t = 3.14, exceeding the tabulated value of 1.93). → Musasia 2016

Evidence

Musasia 2016

Musasia, A. M., Ocholla, A. A., & Sakwa, T. W. (2016). Physics Practical Work and Its Influence on Students' Academic Achievement. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(28). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1118591

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test non-equivalent group study in ten Kenyan secondary schools; 235 experimental and 215 control students. The t-test on post-test means showed "the control group and experimental group performance were signi ficantly different from each other".

"The t-test value was 3.14; this was greater t han the tabulated t-value (1.93). This indicates th at the control group and experimental group performance were signi ficantly different from each other."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.