Pupils taught with the IWB and XERTE resource scored no better on post-tests than pupils taught traditionally¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? There were no significant differences between post-test marks of pupils taught via IWB/ER and traditional methods. → Bahadur 2013
Evidence¶
Bahadur 2013¶
Bahadur, G. K. & Oogarah, D. (2013). Interactive whiteboard for primary schools in Mauritius: An effective tool or just another trend? IJEDICT, 9(1), 19-35. http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu//viewarticle.php?id=1559
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Quasi-experiment in three Standard 5 classes from two schools (40 test pupils), with matched-ability groups taught the Solar System via IWB/ER or traditionally, pre- and post-tested. The article reports means of "6.6 as compared to 6.3" correct and "3.9 ... 4.2" wrong, with no significant T-test difference.
"The mean performance of students who answered correctly using the IWB was 6.6 as compared to 6.3 for those who did not use the IWB. As those who answered the questions wrong, the means performance was 3.9 for those who used IWB as compared to 4.2 to those who did not use the IWB. The T- test revealed that there are no significant differences between the two marks obtained by the students."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- IWB lessons produced greater engagement and enthusiasm but not better performance — a broader claim this one bears on
- Students taught with the animation model significantly outperformed traditionally taught control students on the ATP generation post-test — reports the opposite
- Fifth-grade students taught mathematics with fine art integration achieved significantly higher scores on all four mathematics tests than students taught traditionally — reports the opposite
- Year 4 pupils taught two-dimensional shape properties with Logo outperformed a traditionally taught control group on the post-test — reports the opposite
- Computer-assisted teaching of the passive voice produced significantly higher post-test achievement than traditional instruction among Jordanian first-secondary EFL pupils — reports the opposite
- Computer-based science and technology instruction produces significantly higher corrected post-test achievement than traditional teaching in the Earth, Sun and Moon unit — reports the opposite
- 5E-based guidance materials produced significantly better post-test conceptual understanding of \"What is the Earth's Crust Composed of?\" than the existing textbook, with no pre-test difference between groups — reports the opposite
- Secondary students taught in an e-classroom with ICT resources significantly outperform students taught by conventional methods on post-test achievement — reports the opposite
- Both ITS and traditionally instructed groups improved significantly from pre-test to post-test — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.