Claims

Computer-assisted teaching of the passive voice produced significantly higher post-test achievement than traditional instruction among Jordanian first-secondary EFL pupils

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Pupils taught the passive voice via computer scored significantly higher on the post-test than pupils taught the same item by the traditional method (F = 75.47, Sig. 0.000). → Abdallah M Abu Naba'h 2012

Evidence

Abdallah M Abu Naba'h 2012

Abdallah M Abu Naba'h. (2012). The impact of computer assisted grammar teaching on EFL pupils’ performance in Jordan. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 8(1), 71-90. http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu//viewarticle.php?id=1408

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experiment with 212 first-secondary pupils in two public schools in Zarqa; two sections taught the passive voice via computer and two via the traditional method, analysed by 3-way ANCOVA on post-test scores. The "computed (F) value was (75.47)". Post-test means were 26.21 (computerized) vs 23.95 (traditional), a difference of 2.26.

"The computed (F) value was (75.47) which is statistically significant at (α < 0.05). This shows that there is a significant effect of the use of a computerized software program on the achievement of students."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.