Claims

Four weeks of minimally invasive mitral valve simulation training reduced task completion time and raised skills scores for both students and residents

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students' mean time to completion fell from 54 (SD 5) to 35 (SD 6) minutes and residents' from 47 (SD 6) to 31 (SD 6) minutes (both p < 0.05), with skills scores rising from 131 (SD 21) to 208 (SD 19) for students and 149 (SD 21) to 237 (SD 15) for residents (p < 0.05). → EL-Andari R 2023

Evidence

EL-Andari R 2023

EL-Andari R, Bozso SJ, Kang JJH, Fialka NM, Adams C, Nagendran J. (2023). Teaching heart valve surgery techniques using simulators: a systematic review. Canadian Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.017921

q2 · i? · review · r2

Pre-post training study reported in the review: 10 residents and 10 students learned minimally invasive mitral valve techniques over 6 sessions in 4 weeks on a simulator comprising an aluminum conduit simulating the incision; evaluations included skills scores and time to completion, all reported improvements significant at p < 0.05.

"Students' mean time to completion improved from an initial 54 (SD 5) minutes to a final 35 (SD 6) minutes (p < 0.05), and residents' mean time improved from an initial 47 (SD 6) minutes to a final 31 (SD 6) minutes (p < 0.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.