Claims

A 3-week high-fidelity mitral valve repair simulation program improved residents' scores on all 11 OSATS assessment points and reduced completion time

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Eleven cardiothoracic residents with no previous clinical mitral valve experience showed significant improvement on all 11 points of a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills, and mean completion time fell from 31 (SD 9) to 25 (SD 6) minutes (p = 0.03). → EL-Andari R 2023

Evidence

EL-Andari R 2023

EL-Andari R, Bozso SJ, Kang JJH, Fialka NM, Adams C, Nagendran J. (2023). Teaching heart valve surgery techniques using simulators: a systematic review. Canadian Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.017921

q2 · i? · review · r2

Pre-post simulation program reported in the review: 11 first- to third-year cardiothoracic surgery residents used a 3-pronged approach of instructional videos, a plastic mitral valve model, and evaluation on a porcine heart model with annuloplasty rings; performance videos from peripheral and head-mounted cameras were used for assessment.

"There was a significant improvement in feedback scores on all 11 points of the assessment. Furthermore, mean time to completion was significantly reduced after the program (31 [SD 9] min v. 25 [SD 6] min) (p = 0.03)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.