Claims

In a 39-session simulation curriculum, first-year cardiothoracic residents improved their aortic valve replacement skill scores from the first to the final session

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 27 first-year cardiothoracic surgery residents in a 39-session SBT curriculum improved from an average Likert score of 3.89 to 4.61 on the AVR assessment tool. → EL-Andari R 2023

Evidence

EL-Andari R 2023

EL-Andari R, Bozso SJ, Kang JJH, Fialka NM, Adams C, Nagendran J. (2023). Teaching heart valve surgery techniques using simulators: a systematic review. Canadian Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.017921

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

Curriculum study reported in the review: 27 first-year cardiothoracic residents completed a 39-session curriculum using component-based task training and skill repetition, progressing from individual tasks to complete procedures, scored on 5-point Likert scales. Means and CIs are descriptive; no effect size printed.

"Residents showed improvement from their first session with the AVR assessment tool to their final session (average Likert score 3.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.57–4.22 v. 4.61, 95% CI 4.43–4.79)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.