Claims

Schools implementing MTSS with higher fidelity show less absenteeism

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Schools that implement MTSS with higher fidelity have less school absenteeism than schools implementing with less fidelity. → Kearney CA 2019

Evidence

Kearney CA 2019

Kearney CA, Gonzálvez C, Graczyk PA and Fornander MJ (2019) Reconciling Contemporary Approaches to School Attendance and School Absenteeism: Toward Promotion and Nimble Response, Global Policy Review and Implementation, and Future Adaptability (Part 1). Front. Psychol. 10:2222. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02222

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review reports, citing Freeman et al. (2016), an observational comparison of schools by MTSS implementation fidelity. The comparison names two different groups (higher- vs. lower-fidelity schools); no effect size or sample details are printed in the quoted passage.

"schools that implement MTSS with higher fidelity have less school absenteeism than schools that implement with less fidelity"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id mtss-fidelity-lower-absenteeism
title Schools implementing MTSS with higher fidelity show less absenteeism
description Schools implementing MTSS with higher fidelity show less absenteeism
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — kearney-ca-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.