Claims

Kinescope recordings of television instruction were equally effective as regular instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 1955 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Showings of kinescope recordings of the live television instruction were equally effective as regular instruction. → Kanner 1955

Evidence

Kanner 1955

Kanner, J. H., Runyon, R. P., & Desiderato, O. (1955). Television in Army Training: Evaluation of Television in Army Basic Training (Technical Report No. 14). Human Resources Research Office, The George Washington University. Read through Twyford's 1955 research abstract, doi:10.1007/bf02719927

q2 · i? · causal · r?

Second comparison in the Army basic training evaluation, contrasting kinescope recordings of the live television instruction with regular instruction. The report states the two "were equally effective".

"The comparisons be- tween showings of kinescope recordings of instruction and regular instruction indicated that they were equally effective."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id kinescope-recordings-equally-effective
title Kinescope recordings of television instruction were equally effective as regular instruction
description Kinescope recordings of television instruction were equally effective as regular instruction
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1955
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — kanner-1955

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.