Live television and television recordings were superior to local instructors in teaching Naval Air Reservists.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 1953 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Instruction by live TV and TV recordings produced better learning outcomes than conventional local classroom instruction for Naval Air Reservists. → Fordham University 1953
Evidence¶
Fordham University 1953¶
Fordham University. (1953). Training by Television: the Comparative Effectiveness of Instruction by Television, Television Recordings, and Conventional Classroom Procedures. Special Devices Center, Port Washington, L. I., New York. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED000002
q2 · i? · causal · r1
The study compared comparable groups of Naval Air Reservists taught a series of training lessons by live television, kinescope recordings, or conventional classroom instruction, with effectiveness evaluated by information tests and trainee comments. The abstract reports "Instruction by live TV and TV recording were superior to local instructors."
"Instruction by live TV and TV recording were superior to local instructors. Live TV and TV recordings were about equal in their effectiveness."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Direct TV narration appeared to be the most effective method of presentation. — related
- deKieffer taught one of the first distance learning classes via television from the University of Colorado — related
- Live television and television recordings were about equal in their instructional effectiveness. — related
- Naval trainees generally liked television instruction, with over half the comments being favorable. — related
- The measured advantage of computer-based instruction over conventional teaching shrinks when the same teacher teaches both versions — related
- Kinescope recordings of television instruction were equally effective as regular instruction — reports the opposite
- Television instruction was at least as effective as regular instruction in Army basic training — related
- Almost 90 percent of comparisons between television and conventional instruction showed no substantial differences in achievement or information gain — a broader claim this one bears on
- Reservists accepted TV instruction, more than half preferring it to conventional classroom instruction — related
- College students taught by television compared favorably with those receiving regular instruction, with attitudes differing only for the on-campus television group — related
- Reservists retained most TV-learned material at retesting, officers 85% and enlisted men 65% — related
- Televised Navy indoctrination instruction produced no differences in achievement scores compared with conventional instruction — related
- Using television in army training is feasible, according to the summarized research — a broader claim this one bears on
- Ten Army installations use television for teaching, with five more scheduled within the next year — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
tv-instruction-superior-to-local-instructors-naval-reservists |
title |
Live television and television recordings were superior to local instructors in teaching Naval Air Reservists. |
description |
Live television and television recordings were superior to local instructors in teaching Naval Air Reservists. |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1953 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — fordham-university-1953 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.