Ladders to Literacy shows potentially positive effects on alphabetics, with an average improvement index of +25 percentile points and a domain average effect size of 0.69¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2007 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Four studies meeting WWC standards with reservations examined alphabetics, and Ladders to Literacy was rated as having potentially positive effects; the average improvement index of +25 percentile points (range +8 to +47) and the domain average effect size of 0.69 come from the three studies with computable effect sizes (the fourth, Fuchs et al. 2001, had none). → What Works Clearinghouse 2007
Evidence¶
What Works Clearinghouse 2007¶
What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. (2007). Ladders to Literacy for Kindergarten Students. WWC Intervention Report. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/InterventionReport/259
q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2
WWC synthesis of four studies (760 kindergarten students, more than 14 elementary schools) meeting standards with reservations. The report states "The average improvement index for alphabetics is +25 percentile points across three studies"; the printed domain average effect size for alphabetics is 0.69, and the rating was potentially positive effects.
"The average improvement index for alphabetics is +25 percentile points across three studies, with a range of +8 to +47 percentile points across findings."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Ladders to Literacy shows mixed effects on comprehension, with no statistically significant vocabulary effects in any study despite an average improvement index of +9 — related
- No studies meeting WWC evidence standards addressed general reading achievement for Ladders to Literacy — related
- SpellRead™ shows potentially positive effects on alphabetics for adolescent readers, with an average improvement index of +23 across two studies — related
- DaisyQuest has positive effects on phonological processing in preschool children, with a domain-average effect size of 0.68 across two randomized controlled trials — related
- Ladders to Literacy shows potentially positive effects on fluency based on a single non-significant finding with an effect size of 0.72 and an improvement index of +26 — related
- The WWC rates Project CRISS® as having potentially positive effects on comprehension for adolescent learners, with an average improvement index of +20 percentile points — related
- The WWC rates PALS as having potentially positive effects on alphabetics, no discernible effects on fluency, and mixed effects on comprehension for beginning readers — related
- STeLLA® has potentially positive effects on science achievement, with a statistically significant effect size of 0.68 and an improvement index of +25 percentile points — related
- Earobics® has positive effects on alphabetics for K–3 beginning readers, based on four WWC-reviewed studies — related
- Sound Partners tutoring has positive effects on the alphabetics of beginning readers in grades K–3 — related
- Lexia Reading has potentially positive effects on alphabetics for beginning readers — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ladders-to-literacy-potentially-positive-alphabetics |
title |
Ladders to Literacy shows potentially positive effects on alphabetics, with an average improvement index of +25 percentile points and a domain average effect size of 0.69 |
description |
Ladders to Literacy shows potentially positive effects on alphabetics, with an average improvement index of +25 percentile points and a domain average effect size of 0.69 |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2007 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — what-works-clearinghouse-2007 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.