Claims

Treatment-group students scored a mean of 70.12 versus 48.03 for conventionally taught students on the Literature-in-English Achievement Test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Descriptive posttest means favoured the treatment group: 70.12 (SD 16.26, n 60) versus 48.03 (SD 13.23, n 60) for the control group. → Mbah 2015

Evidence

Mbah 2015

Mbah, B. A. (2015). Effects of prior knowledge of topics and the instructional objectives on students' achievement in Literature-in-English. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(20). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1079053

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive statistics from Table 1 of the quasi-experiment, reported as mean and standard deviation for each group of 60 students; these are descriptive values, with the inferential test reported separately in Table 3.

"the stud ents exposed to instructional objectives had mean a chievement score of 70.12 and standard deviation of 16.26; whi le those taught with conventional method had mean achievement score of 48.03 and standard deviation of 13. 23"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.