Leisure readers are far more likely than non-leisure readers to enjoy reading and to engage in mental imagery, in both educational tracks¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In the lower track, leisure readers reported significantly more reading enjoyment and mental imagery than non-leisure readers. → Mol SE and Jolles J 2014
q3 i? In the higher track, leisure readers were significantly more likely to enjoy reading and engage in mental imagery than non-leisure readers. → Mol SE and Jolles J 2014 (2)
Evidence¶
Mol SE and Jolles J 2014¶
Mol SE and Jolles J (2014) Reading enjoyment amongst non-leisure readers can affect achievement in secondary school. Front. Psychol. 5:1214. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01214
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Chi-square analysis among 375 lower-track seventh graders; 19.5% were leisure readers. The article reports "leisure readers reported significantly more reading enjoyment" and imagery than non-leisure readers, with almost all non-enjoyers being non-leisure readers (97.6%).
"leisure readers reported significantly more read-ing enjoyment [χ2(1) = 35.84, p < 0.001] and mental imagery [χ2(1) = 7.36, p = 0.007] than non-leisure readers"
Mol SE and Jolles J 2014 (2)¶
Mol SE and Jolles J (2014) Reading enjoyment amongst non-leisure readers can affect achievement in secondary school. Front. Psychol. 5:1214. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01214
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Chi-square analysis among 696 higher-track seventh graders; 32.5% were leisure readers. The article reports leisure readers were "significantly more likely to enjoy reading" and to engage in mental imagery, with 98.6% of non-enjoyers being non-leisure readers.
"Leisure readers were significantly more likely to enjoy read-ing [χ2(1) = 83.02, p < 0.001] and to engage in mental imagery [χ2(1) = 10.48, p = 0.001] than non-leisure readers"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Only a minority of Dutch seventh graders read for leisure, with lower prevalence in the pre-vocational track (19.5%) than the pre-academic track (32.5%) — related
- A majority of non-leisure readers report enjoying reading in general (59% lower track, 69% higher track) — related
- Boys read for leisure and enjoy reading less than girls, but no sex differences appear in mental imagery — related
- In the lower track, reading enjoyment relates to school achievement for girls but not for boys among non-leisure readers — related
- Mental imagery shows no direct relation to school achievement among non-leisure readers, though a ceiling effect limits this null finding — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
leisure-readers-enjoy-imagery-both-tracks |
title |
Leisure readers are far more likely than non-leisure readers to enjoy reading and to engage in mental imagery, in both educational tracks |
description |
Leisure readers are far more likely than non-leisure readers to enjoy reading and to engage in mental imagery, in both educational tracks |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2014 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — mol-se-and-jolles-j-2014, mol-se-and-jolles-j-2014-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.