Claims

Leisure readers are far more likely than non-leisure readers to enjoy reading and to engage in mental imagery, in both educational tracks

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In the lower track, leisure readers reported significantly more reading enjoyment and mental imagery than non-leisure readers. → Mol SE and Jolles J 2014 q3 i? In the higher track, leisure readers were significantly more likely to enjoy reading and engage in mental imagery than non-leisure readers. → Mol SE and Jolles J 2014 (2)

Evidence

Mol SE and Jolles J 2014

Mol SE and Jolles J (2014) Reading enjoyment amongst non-leisure readers can affect achievement in secondary school. Front. Psychol. 5:1214. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01214

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Chi-square analysis among 375 lower-track seventh graders; 19.5% were leisure readers. The article reports "leisure readers reported significantly more reading enjoyment" and imagery than non-leisure readers, with almost all non-enjoyers being non-leisure readers (97.6%).

"leisure readers reported significantly more read-ing enjoyment [χ2(1) = 35.84, p < 0.001] and mental imagery [χ2(1) = 7.36, p = 0.007] than non-leisure readers"

Mol SE and Jolles J 2014 (2)

Mol SE and Jolles J (2014) Reading enjoyment amongst non-leisure readers can affect achievement in secondary school. Front. Psychol. 5:1214. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01214

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Chi-square analysis among 696 higher-track seventh graders; 32.5% were leisure readers. The article reports leisure readers were "significantly more likely to enjoy reading" and to engage in mental imagery, with 98.6% of non-enjoyers being non-leisure readers.

"Leisure readers were significantly more likely to enjoy read-ing [χ2(1) = 83.02, p < 0.001] and to engage in mental imagery [χ2(1) = 10.48, p = 0.001] than non-leisure readers"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id leisure-readers-enjoy-imagery-both-tracks
title Leisure readers are far more likely than non-leisure readers to enjoy reading and to engage in mental imagery, in both educational tracks
description Leisure readers are far more likely than non-leisure readers to enjoy reading and to engage in mental imagery, in both educational tracks
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2014
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — mol-se-and-jolles-j-2014, mol-se-and-jolles-j-2014-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.