Boys read for leisure and enjoy reading less than girls, but no sex differences appear in mental imagery¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In the higher track, 19% of boys versus 46% of girls were leisure readers, with significant sex differences in leisure reading and enjoyment but not mental imagery. → Mol SE and Jolles J 2014
Evidence¶
Mol SE and Jolles J 2014¶
Mol SE and Jolles J (2014) Reading enjoyment amongst non-leisure readers can affect achievement in secondary school. Front. Psychol. 5:1214. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01214
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Chi-square analyses among 696 higher-track students. The article reports "Nineteen percent of all boys and 46% of all girls were leisure readers" and significant sex differences in leisure reading and enjoyment; standardized residuals did not exceed the critical range for mental imagery, showing no sex differences.
"Nineteen percent of all boys and 46% of all girls were leisure readers. Of all leisure readers, 31.0% were boys. Significant sex differences were found in leisure reading [χ2(1) = 57.71, p < 0.001) and reading enjoyment [χ2(1) = 38.45, p < 0.001)"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Gender — predictor: outcomes differ by group: a gap reflecting circumstances and treatment, not a cause
Related Claims¶
- In the higher track, reading enjoyment and sex show main effects on non-leisure readers' school achievement, with enjoyers of both sexes scoring higher — related
- Leisure readers are far more likely than non-leisure readers to enjoy reading and to engage in mental imagery, in both educational tracks — related
- Only a minority of Dutch seventh graders read for leisure, with lower prevalence in the pre-vocational track (19.5%) than the pre-academic track (32.5%) — related
- Mental imagery shows no direct relation to school achievement among non-leisure readers, though a ceiling effect limits this null finding — related
- Findings on gender differences in engagement with adaptive learning platforms are mixed, with some studies showing higher engagement among girls and others among boys — related
- A majority of non-leisure readers report enjoying reading in general (59% lower track, 69% higher track) — related
- Studies reporting age and gender differences in student engagement unanimously show higher engagement for girls and younger students — related
- Girls show higher reading enjoyment and lower math enjoyment than boys, with no science enjoyment difference, after controlling for achievement, SES, and age — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
sex-differences-leisure-reading-enjoyment-not-imagery |
title |
Boys read for leisure and enjoy reading less than girls, but no sex differences appear in mental imagery |
description |
Boys read for leisure and enjoy reading less than girls, but no sex differences appear in mental imagery |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2014 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mol-se-and-jolles-j-2014 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.