Claims

In the lower track, reading enjoyment relates to school achievement for girls but not for boys among non-leisure readers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2014 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 The sex × reading enjoyment interaction on school achievement was significant among lower-track non-leisure readers (η2 = 0.02), with girl enjoyers scoring 0.40 grade points higher. → Mol SE and Jolles J 2014

Evidence

Mol SE and Jolles J 2014

Mol SE and Jolles J (2014) Reading enjoyment amongst non-leisure readers can affect achievement in secondary school. Front. Psychol. 5:1214. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01214

q3 · i1 · associational · r2

GLM Univariate ANCOVA with classroom type as covariate among 290 lower-track non-leisure readers. The article reports "girls who were reading enjoyers scored 0.40 average grade points higher" than non-enjoyers, while boys' enjoyment did not explain achievement.

"The interaction between sex and reading enjoyment was significant as well [F(1,283) = 6.41, p = 0.012, η2 = 0.02]. As is shown in Figure 1A, girls who were reading enjoyers scored 0.40 average grade points higher than girls who were non-enjoyers; whereas boys’ reading enjoyment did not seem to explain their school achievements."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id lower-track-enjoyment-grades-girls-only
title In the lower track, reading enjoyment relates to school achievement for girls but not for boys among non-leisure readers
description In the lower track, reading enjoyment relates to school achievement for girls but not for boys among non-leisure readers
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2014
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — mol-se-and-jolles-j-2014

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.