Claims

Experimental classes taught with local-wisdom-based social studies materials scored higher on knowledge than control classes after one semester

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After one semester, the experimental group's knowledge test results were higher than the control group's (t count = 18.61 > t table = 1.98 at α = 0.05). → Uge 2019

Evidence

Uge 2019

Uge, S., Neolaka, A., & Yasin, M. (2019). Development of Social Studies Learning Model Based on Local Wisdom in Improving Students' Knowledge and Social Attitude. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 375-388. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12323a

q2 · i? · causal · r1

One-semester implementation (August–December 2017) with experimental and control class design: 47 experimental and 41 control students took a 40-question multiple-choice knowledge test; means were 32.43 versus 13.54, and the t test found "t count = 18,61 > of ttable = 1,98 at significance α = 0,05".

"T test results for student knowledge data show t count = 18,61 > of ttable = 1,98 at significance α = 0,05, then H o rejected and accept H 1."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.