Claims

A local-wisdom-based social studies learning model is judged feasible by expert panels, with CVR > 0 on every assessed item

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Expert panels (material, linguist, graphic design, locality, and test-instrument experts) rated all items of the developed model good, with CVR values above 0. → Uge 2019

Evidence

Uge 2019

Uge, S., Neolaka, A., & Yasin, M. (2019). Development of Social Studies Learning Model Based on Local Wisdom in Improving Students' Knowledge and Social Attitude. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 375-388. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12323a

q2 · i? · design · r3

Expert validation stage of the R&D study: three material experts rated 59 statement items using the Lawshe Content Validity Ratio, with every item scoring CVR = 1.00, "which means that e ach item was declared good". Linguist, graphic design, locality and instrument-expert panels likewise returned CVR > 0 on all items.

"The results of assessment data analysis 3 material experts from 59 statement items showed the value of CVR > 0. The value of CVR for each statement item amounted to 1,00 which means that e ach item was declared good."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.