Mastery goals predict recognition of a disagreeing partner's competence after a real sociocognitive conflict¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i2 Among high-school students in a real computer-mediated sociocognitive conflict, mastery goals significantly predicted reported partner competence (η² = .06), while performance goals did not. → Darnon 2006

Evidence¶

Darnon 2006¶

Darnon, C., Muller, D., Schrager, S. M., Pannuzzo, N., & Butera, F. (2006). Mastery and Performance Goals Predict Epistemic and Relational Conflict Regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 766–776. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.766

q3 · i2 · associational · r1

Study 2 regression (63 tenth-graders in a computer-mediated cooperative task with prerecorded disagreeing answers) showed "mastery goals sig- nificantly predicted reports of the other's competence" (B = 0.38, η² = .06); performance goals and the interaction were non-significant.

"As expected, mastery goals sig- nificantly predicted reports of the other's competence ( B /H110050.38), t(55) /H110052.26, p /H11021.03 (/H92572 /H11005.06). The more participants endorsed mastery goals, the more they thought their partner was competent."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Achievement Goal Orientation — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes

Related Claims¶

• After a sociocognitive conflict, mastery goals predict interest in task information while performance goals predict interest in the grade — related
• Performance goals predict assertion of one's own competence after a real sociocognitive conflict — related
• Mastery goals positively predict self-reported epistemic conflict regulation in an imagined sociocognitive conflict — related
• Performance goals regulate conflict with more-competent others toward competitive (approach) or protective (avoidance) interpersonal behavior — related