Latent profile analysis of pre-service teachers' CT skills identifies three profiles (Novice, Developing, Proficient), revealing heterogeneous, non-linear skill acquisition¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2031: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? LPA on standardized digital literacy, problem-solving, and coding comfort scores identified a three-profile model (Novice 34%, Developing 45%, Proficient 21%) as optimal among 128 pre-service teachers. → Tanya Chichekian 2026
Evidence¶
Tanya Chichekian 2026¶
Tanya Chichekian, Maria Cutumisu, Annie Savard and Yi-Mei Zhang. (2026). Profiling Pre-service Teachers' Computational Thinking: The Role of Metacognition and Coding Experience. Journal of Learning Analytics, 13(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2026.9077
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Latent profile analysis of survey data from 128 pre-service teachers identified three CT profiles. The three-profile model showed "high entropy (.84, threshold ≥ .80), significant BLRT ( p = .01)" and lower AIC (995.93) and BIC (1035.85) than the two-profile model; the four-profile model included a small 3% profile with marginal BLRT (p = .06).
"LPA on standardized CT_DL, CT_PS, and CT_CD scores identified a three-profile model (Novice, 34%, n = 43; Developing, 45%, n = 58; Proficient, 21%, n = 27) as optimal, based on statistical fit indices and theoretical alignment"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Metacognitive strategies and prior coding experience significantly predict CT profile membership, with metacognition contributing more strongly — related
- Proficient learners complete the CT task faster and with fewer clicks than Novice and Developing learners — related
- Proficient learners report lower perceived task difficulty than Novice learners on the CT task — related
- Prior coding experience correlates positively with digital literacy and coding comfort and negatively with perceived task difficulty — related
- Metacognitive strategies correlate strongly with problem-solving skills, and behavioural metrics correlate with task performance — related
- Hierarchical clustering of CDM attainment probabilities identifies five learner groups with distinct patterns of professional standards attainment — related
- Exploratory K-means clustering identifies four heterogeneous student AI-user profiles differing in experience, competence, usefulness, trust, and control, but the solution's optimality and stability are not established — related
- Heterogeneous learning curves across practitioners create organizational challenges including perceived unfairness — related
- Students with moderate initial CT levels show substantially greater self-efficacy gains than high-CT and low-CT peers, an 'Optimal Development Zone' effect — related
- Gaussian Mixture Modeling identifies two latent clusters of delayed start behavior, outperforming three-cluster and unimodal models — related
- Profiles differ in self-perceived academic skills: Engaged and Literate users report the highest problem-solving and cognitive endurance gains, while Uncritical Reliant users report the highest independent thinking — related
- Secondary students in AI learning fall into three distinct SDT-based motivational profiles — Disengaged, Developing, and Self-Determined — at both pre- and post-test — related
- Four distinct LLM learner profiles emerge from latent class analysis of learning contexts, tasks, and devices — related
- Exploratory heat maps reveal three student groups, including disengaged-but-successful students more prevalent in the Python courses, showing low content completion can link to both positive and negative outcomes — related
- Latent learner profiles did not moderate the effectiveness of the adaptive ITS — related
- High school novices show large CT learning gains after using RoboBlockly Studio, improving Bebras performance from 1.28 to 2.88 of 4 tasks — related
- Cluster analysis identifies two antagonistic student profiles differing in level of technology-supported self-regulated learning — related
- Discussion thread length is strongly linearly related to the number of players contributing, indicating collective rather than small-group collaboration — related
- Latent profile analysis of 2015 PISA data identifies four collaborative problem-solver profiles among Chinese 15-year-old students — related
- Latent profile analysis identifies three learner profiles differing in cognitive factors, self-concept, and extraneous load, with significant performance differences — related
- Students' preference levels for the four learning modalities were positively correlated, and cluster analysis separated a lower-preference group (135 students) from a higher-preference group (170 students) — related
- A two-dimensional profiling method based on initial artifact quality and criterion-aligned revision categorizes student groups into four analytic profiles in an AI-supported RQ/hypothesis revision activity — related
- Cluster profiles of student mathematics performance are dominated by overall ability, with most clusters being linear rescalings of average exam performance — reports the opposite
- Latent profile analysis of primary teachers' SRL competence yields two quantitative profiles (low vs. high competence) rather than three qualitatively distinct situative, cognitive, or mixed profiles — related
- During a year-long AI curriculum, most students maintained or moved upward in motivational profile, with substantial upward transitions out of the Disengaged profile — related
- Four distinct action-control belief profiles (agentic, moderate, avoidant, and mixed) emerge among Finnish ninth graders — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
three-ct-profiles-preservice-teachers-lpa |
title |
Latent profile analysis of pre-service teachers' CT skills identifies three profiles (Novice, Developing, Proficient), revealing heterogeneous, non-linear skill acquisition |
description |
Latent profile analysis of pre-service teachers' CT skills identifies three profiles (Novice, Developing, Proficient), revealing heterogeneous, non-linear skill acquisition |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
recheck_by |
2031 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — tanya-chichekian-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.