In low challenge dyads the metacognitive activities are closely interconnected, whereas in high challenge dyads monitoring is disconnected from other metacognitive activities¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the low challenge process model, the analysis*evaluation cluster has a bi-directional relation with monitoring, indicating high interaction among metacognitive activities. → Cindy Paans & Erdem Onan & Inge Molenaar & Ludo Verhoeven & Eliane Segers 2019 q2 i? In the high challenge process model, monitoring is not connected to the other metacognitive activities. → Cindy Paans & Erdem Onan & Inge Molenaar & Ludo Verhoeven & Eliane Segers 2019 (2)

Evidence¶

Cindy Paans & Erdem Onan & Inge Molenaar & Ludo Verhoeven & Eliane Segers 2019¶

Cindy Paans & Erdem Onan & Inge Molenaar & Ludo Verhoeven & Eliane Segers. (2019). How social challenges affect children's regulation and assignment quality in hypermedia: a process mining study. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09204-9

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Fuzzy Miner process model of the 18 low-challenge dyads' coded interactions, built in ProM 6.7 with utility ratio .75, edge cut-off .20, node cut-off .25; average conformance 77.22% (SD = 6.76%).

"This analysis*evaluation cluster has a bi-directional relation with monitoring. This shows there is a high interaction between the various metacognitive activities."

Cindy Paans & Erdem Onan & Inge Molenaar & Ludo Verhoeven & Eliane Segers 2019 (2)¶

Cindy Paans & Erdem Onan & Inge Molenaar & Ludo Verhoeven & Eliane Segers. (2019). How social challenges affect children's regulation and assignment quality in hypermedia: a process mining study. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09204-9

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Fuzzy Miner process model of the 12 high-challenge dyads; analysis and evaluation remained individual categories with evaluation leading to analysis, and monitoring isolated from them. Average conformance was 62.85% (SD = 12.33%).

"Monitoring is not connected to the other metacognitive activities."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• High challenge dyads show an isolated bi-directional cycle between social challenge and off-task activities, while low challenge dyads' challenges feed into metacognitive activities — related
• High-cognition appears only in the low challenge process model and off-task activities only in the high challenge process model — related
• Low and high social challenge dyads do not differ in the frequency of metacognitive activities — related
• Low social challenge dyads produce higher-quality written assignments than high social challenge dyads, controlling for prior knowledge — related