High-cognition appears only in the low challenge process model and off-task activities only in the high challenge process model¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? High-cognition reached the significance cut-off only in the low challenge dyads' process model; in the high challenge model it did not reach the cut-off and was excluded. → Cindy Paans & Erdem Onan & Inge Molenaar & Ludo Verhoeven & Eliane Segers 2019
Evidence¶
Cindy Paans & Erdem Onan & Inge Molenaar & Ludo Verhoeven & Eliane Segers 2019¶
Cindy Paans & Erdem Onan & Inge Molenaar & Ludo Verhoeven & Eliane Segers. (2019). How social challenges affect children's regulation and assignment quality in hypermedia: a process mining study. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09204-9
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Fuzzy Miner process model of the 12 high-challenge dyads, where reading showed a one-directional pathway to processing only. In the low challenge model, high-cognition appeared with one-directional paths from reading and to processing and support.
"High-cognitiondid not reach the significance cut-off value and was therefore not included in the process model."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- High challenge dyads show an isolated bi-directional cycle between social challenge and off-task activities, while low challenge dyads' challenges feed into metacognitive activities — related
- High social challenge dyads show more off-task activities than low social challenge dyads — related
- Low social challenge dyads verbalize more cognitive processing and more high-cognition than high social challenge dyads — related
- In low challenge dyads the metacognitive activities are closely interconnected, whereas in high challenge dyads monitoring is disconnected from other metacognitive activities — related
- Low and high social challenge dyads do not differ in the frequency of metacognitive activities — related
- Low social challenge dyads produce higher-quality written assignments than high social challenge dyads, controlling for prior knowledge — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
high-cognition-only-low-challenge-model |
title |
High-cognition appears only in the low challenge process model and off-task activities only in the high challenge process model |
description |
High-cognition appears only in the low challenge process model and off-task activities only in the high challenge process model |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — cindy-paans-erdem-onan-inge-molenaar-ludo-verhoeven-eliane-segers-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.