Middle-term ToM and SIP training improves preschoolers' social problem solving more than free play¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 A repeated measures ANOVA showed significant time-by-group interactions on the RES total and RES Question 3 in favor of the experimental group. → Houssa and Nader-Grosbois 2016
q3 i3 The trained group produced fewer wrong/no justifications and more intersubjective-level justifications than controls. → Houssa and Nader-Grosbois 2016 (2)
Evidence¶
Houssa and Nader-Grosbois 2016¶
Marine Houssa, Nathalie Nader-Grosbois. (2016). Experimental Study of Middle-term Training in Social Cognition in Preschoolers. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i1.972
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
Randomized experiment with 48 preschoolers (24 per group) in 15 sessions. The interaction on RES total was significant, "F(1,23) = 8.54, p = .005, η²p = .16"; Question 3 showed F(1,23) = 9.10, p = .004, η²p = .17.
"A repeated measure ANOVA showed significant time by group interactions on the SIP measure in favor of the experimental group. This interaction is significant for the RES total ( F(1,23) = 8.54, p = .005, η²p = .16)"
Houssa and Nader-Grosbois 2016 (2)¶
Marine Houssa, Nathalie Nader-Grosbois. (2016). Experimental Study of Middle-term Training in Social Cognition in Preschoolers. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i1.972
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
Same repeated measures ANOVA on justification levels: wrong/no justification interaction "F(1,23) = 16.59, p = .00, η²p = .27" and intersubjective level "F(1,23) = 4.01, p = .051, η²p = .08".
"for two levels of justification ( wrong/no justification: F(1,23) = 16.59, p = .00, η²p = .27 and inter-subjective level: F(1,23) = 4.01, p = .051, η²p = .08)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Group condition predicts post-test SIP after controlling for pre-test, but not post-test ToM — related
- Trained preschoolers were perceived as improving on the EASE non-ToM social adjustment scale — related
- Preschoolers' social cognition correlates with age, IQ, personality factors and social adjustment — related
- The training group outperforms controls on social problem resolution, with a significant group effect and a marginal interaction — related
- The classroom training improves Theory of Mind performance — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.