No significant difference in the experimental group's visual perception between measurements taken after the program and one month later¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? A paired-samples t-test found no statistically significant difference between the experimental group's visual perception averages across the two post-program measurements (t = 0.067, statistical significance 0.947). → Alenizi 2019

Evidence¶

Alenizi 2019¶

Alenizi, M.A. (2019). Effectiveness of a Program Based on A Multi-Sensory Strategy in Developing Visual Perception of Primary School Learners with Learning Disabilities: A Contextual Study of Arabic Learners. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 8(1), 72-104. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2019.3346

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired-samples t-test on the 30-learner experimental group, reported in Table 4 of the Results section, comparing visual perception across two measurements after the program. The table prints t = 0.067 and statistical significance 0.947; the accompanying text states the values "did not reach the values of "t" at the statistical significance level of 0.05 α". No effect size is printed.

"Visual perception Post-test 1.81 0.07 0.067 0.947 Pre-test 1.82 0.07"

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Visual Processing — outcome: instruction changes it

Related Claims¶

• The experimental group's visual perception average rose from pre-test to post-test after the multi-sensory program — related
• During the multi-sensory program all thirty participants identified the presented visuals and showed positive engagement — related
• Primary-school learners with learning disabilities taught with a multi-sensory strategy scored higher on visual perception at post-test than learners taught with the traditional method — related