During the multi-sensory program all thirty participants identified the presented visuals and showed positive engagement¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q1
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? The article reports observational evidence that all thirty participants identified the visuals presented from their multi-sensory experience and that learners' attention increased during the program. → Alenizi 2019
Evidence¶
Alenizi 2019¶
Alenizi, M.A. (2019). Effectiveness of a Program Based on A Multi-Sensory Strategy in Developing Visual Perception of Primary School Learners with Learning Disabilities: A Contextual Study of Arabic Learners. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 8(1), 72-104. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2019.3346
q1 · i? · causal · r1
Authors' observational report from the Discussion section on learner responses during the program with the 30 experimental-group learners: "All thirty participants identified the visuals presented" and attention levels increased. This is descriptive observation, not a tested comparison; no effect size is printed.
"During the program, most of the participants provided positive feedback and showed signs that they were fully aware of the visual stimulus. All thirty participants identified the visuals presented from their multi -sensory experience. The attention level of the learners' increased substantially as these stimuli produced a greater impact on their learning"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Visual Processing — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- The experimental group's visual perception average rose from pre-test to post-test after the multi-sensory program — related
- Primary-school learners with learning disabilities taught with a multi-sensory strategy scored higher on visual perception at post-test than learners taught with the traditional method — related
- No significant difference in the experimental group's visual perception between measurements taken after the program and one month later — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.