The experimental group's visual perception average rose from pre-test to post-test after the multi-sensory program¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The experimental group's visual perception average was higher at post-test (1.815) than at pre-test (1.418), a descriptive difference the article reports as being in favor of the post-test. → Alenizi 2019
Evidence¶
Alenizi 2019¶
Alenizi, M.A. (2019). Effectiveness of a Program Based on A Multi-Sensory Strategy in Developing Visual Perception of Primary School Learners with Learning Disabilities: A Contextual Study of Arabic Learners. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 8(1), 72-104. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2019.3346
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Within-group pre/post comparison of the 30-learner experimental group reported in the Results section. The article prints descriptive means of 1.418 (pre) and 1.815 (post) and states the result "is in favor of post-test"; no test statistic or effect size is printed for this contrast.
"Table 3 shows the differences between the mean scores of the experimental group of primary school learners with learning difficulties in the two measurements (pre and post) in their visual perception. The result is in favor of post-test with 1.815, while the average of the pre-measurement was appeared to be 1.418."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Visual Processing — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- No significant difference in the experimental group's visual perception between measurements taken after the program and one month later — related
- During the multi-sensory program all thirty participants identified the presented visuals and showed positive engagement — related
- Primary-school learners with learning disabilities taught with a multi-sensory strategy scored higher on visual perception at post-test than learners taught with the traditional method — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.