Primary-school learners with learning disabilities taught with a multi-sensory strategy scored higher on visual perception at post-test than learners taught with the traditional method¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In a quasi-experimental comparison, the experimental group (multi-sensory strategy) achieved a higher post-test visual perception average (1.815) than the control group (traditional method, 1.720), and the article reports the difference as favoring the multi-sensory strategy. → Alenizi 2019

Evidence¶

Alenizi 2019¶

Alenizi, M.A. (2019). Effectiveness of a Program Based on A Multi-Sensory Strategy in Developing Visual Perception of Primary School Learners with Learning Disabilities: A Contextual Study of Arabic Learners. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 8(1), 72-104. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2019.3346

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental group comparison reported in the Results section: 30 learners taught with the multi-sensory strategy versus 30 taught the traditional way, compared with ANCOVA at α = 0.05. The article reports "the value of "f" is 35.538" with statistical significance 0.00 and a post-test mean difference of 0.09 in favor of the multi-sensory group; no effect size value is printed.

"In the average measurement of the two groups control (traditional method) and experimental (multi - sensory strategy), the value of "f" is 35.538 in terms of statistical significance 0.00. Table 1 shows that the differences between the averages of the experimental group (multi-sensory strategy) and control group (traditional method) was 0.09. The result implied that the multi-sensory strategy was more effective than the traditional method of instruction."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Visual Processing — outcome: instruction changes it

Related Claims¶

• During the multi-sensory program all thirty participants identified the presented visuals and showed positive engagement — related
• The experimental group's visual perception average rose from pre-test to post-test after the multi-sensory program — related
• No significant difference in the experimental group's visual perception between measurements taken after the program and one month later — related
• In the post-test, teaching method significantly affected learning of similar English letters among students with learning disabilities, favoring the modified-plus-abstract pictured letters method over traditional teaching — related