Claims

Students reported that multimedia learning motivated them and was more effective and interactive than traditional teaching

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students reported being motivated to learn Computer Networks through the multimedia learning, finding it effective and interactive compared with traditional teaching. → Winarno 2018

Evidence

Winarno 2018

Winarno, S., Muthu, K. S., & Ling, L. S. (2018). Students’ feedback of mdpbl approach and the learning impact towards computer networks teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(1), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.4.1.37

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Learning-impact questionnaire of the mDPBL group (n=136, Table 4). All items showed higher mean scores, e.g. interest to use multimedia learning at 4.15 and learning alone at 4.11; negative items such as motivation decreased scored 2.23.

"In addition, multimedia learning were motivated to learn Computer Networks, it was effective and interactive than traditional teaching."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.