Claims

Multimedia application is more effective than conventional media for sixth-semester students' listening comprehension, per a t-test comparison

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students taught listening comprehension with a multimedia application scored significantly higher than students taught with conventional media (Tcount = 14.68 > Ttable = 2.02, df 38, α 0.05). → Tagor Pangaribuan 2017

Evidence

Tagor Pangaribuan 2017

Tagor Pangaribuan, Andromeda Sinaga & Kammer Tuahman Sipayung. (2017). The Effectiveness of Multimedia Application on Students Listening Comprehension. English Language Teaching, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n12p212

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental classroom study with three experimental and three control classes of 20 students each, analyzed with a t-test. The article reports "Tcount = 14.68 > Ttable = 2.02" at α 0.05 with df 38, concluding multimedia was more effective than conventional media. No effect size is printed.

"The findings st ates that the Tcount = 14.68 > Ttable = 2.02 in α significance 0.05 and degree of freedom 38. It means that, multimedia aplication is effective than conventinal media."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.