Claims

The speaking-skill advantage of multimedia modular instruction is retained at delayed post-test.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group maintained significantly higher speaking-skill scores than the control group on a delayed post-test administered 20 days after instruction. → Jose 2012

Evidence

Jose 2012

Jose, G. R., & Dharma Raja, B. W. (2012). Multimedia Modular Approach for Augmenting the Speaking Skill of the Student-Teachers. i-manager's Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1070215

q2 · i? · causal · r2

A delayed post-test was conducted 20 days after the post-test to assess retention of learning. The experimental group's mean delayed post-test score remained significantly higher than the control group's, indicating that the multimedia modular approach supported better retention of speaking-skill learning.

"In the Table 5, since p value is less than 0.01 in the speaking, the null hypothesis not accepted at 1% level of significance. Hence, it is concluded that there is significant difference in the delayed posttest scores of speaking skill between the control and the experimental groups."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.