Claims

ANCOVA confirms the multimedia group's speaking-skill advantage after adjusting for pre-test differences.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Analysis of covariance, with pre-test scores as covariate, confirmed that the experimental group's adjusted post-test speaking-skill score was significantly higher than the control group's. → Jose 2012

Evidence

Jose 2012

Jose, G. R., & Dharma Raja, B. W. (2012). Multimedia Modular Approach for Augmenting the Speaking Skill of the Student-Teachers. i-manager's Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1070215

q2 · i? · causal · r2

ANCOVA was applied to the final speaking-skill score with pre-test scores partialed out as a covariate. The adjusted mean for the experimental group was 67.36 compared to 27.25 for the control group, a statistically significant difference at the 0.01 level.

"The value of the ANCOVA (Fy. x =621.310) is significant at 0.01 level. From Fy.x, it is clear that the final average score on speaking skill, after adjusted for the initial difference in experimental group (67.36) differ significantly from that in the control group (27.25)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.