Claims

Multimedia modular instruction produces significantly higher speaking-skill post-test scores than traditional method among student-teachers.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group taught through multimedia modules scored significantly higher on the speaking-skill post-test than the control group taught through traditional method. → Jose 2012

Evidence

Jose 2012

Jose, G. R., & Dharma Raja, B. W. (2012). Multimedia Modular Approach for Augmenting the Speaking Skill of the Student-Teachers. i-manager's Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1070215

q2 · i? · causal · r2

A pre-test post-test equivalent group design with 70 B.Ed. student-teachers matched on intelligence test scores. The experimental group (n=35) was taught through a multimedia module while the control group (n=35) received traditional instruction for two months. The article reports a statistically significant difference favoring the experimental group, with the experimental group performing better in the post-test.

"In the Table 2, since p value is less than 0.01 in the speaking skill, the null hypothesis is not accepted at 1% level of significance. Hence, it is concluded that there is significant difference between control and experimental groups in the speaking skill at the posttest score."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.