Transfer from computer-based working-memory and reasoning training in children is narrow: gains stay within the trained domain¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Training on working memory improves untrained working-memory tasks but not inhibition, and probably not reasoning; reasoning training does not improve working memory or processing speed. → Diamond Adele 2012
q2 i? Nonverbal-reasoning training transfers to the same type of nonverbal reasoning but not to a different type, and nonverbal working-memory training did not transfer to verbal working memory. → Diamond Adele 2012
Evidence¶
Diamond Adele 2012¶
Diamond Adele. (2012). Activities and Programs That Improve Children's Executive Functions. Current Directions in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412453722
q2 · i? · review · r2
Narrative review synthesis of computer-based training studies; the review reports that working-memory training "does not improve inhibition" and only probably not reasoning, citing Klingberg et al. (2005) as a possible exception.
"In children, training on working memory improves performance on untrained working memory tasks, but it does not improve inhibition (Thorell et al., 2009) and probably does not improve reasoning or problem solving (Bergman Nutley et al., 2011; Thorell et al., 2009; but see Klingberg et al., 2005)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Executive Function — outcome: instruction changes it
- Working Memory — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- CogMed computerized working-memory training improves practiced working-memory skills with narrow transfer, and controls playing the same games without increasing difficulty show no gains — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Computerized training of inhibition in young children shows limited success, and a randomized trial found narrow, skill-specific transfer of working-memory and reasoning training in 4-year-olds — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Computer-based training reliably improves children's working memory and reasoning, but computerized training has not succeeded in improving 4- to 6-year-olds' inhibitory control — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Task-switching training improves untrained switching and other executive functions in school-aged children, though transfer findings are heterogeneous — related
- Metacognitive scaffolding added to computer-based executive attention training produces larger intelligence gains in preschoolers than regular training or an untrained active control — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Isolated EF interventions show robust near-term EF gains but poor transfer, including to early mathematics — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Digitalised task training shows highly inconsistent evidence, appearing particularly suited to improving working memory — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
narrow-transfer-computerized-ef-training |
title |
Transfer from computer-based working-memory and reasoning training in children is narrow: gains stay within the trained domain |
description |
Transfer from computer-based working-memory and reasoning training in children is narrow: gains stay within the trained domain |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2012 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — diamond-adele-2012 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.