Computerized training of inhibition in young children shows limited success, and a randomized trial found narrow, skill-specific transfer of working-memory and reasoning training in 4-year-olds¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Using CogMed-like dosage, improvements in 4- and 6-year-olds were found on only 2 of 3 practiced inhibition games, with no transfer to unpracticed tasks. → Diamond Adele 2011
q2 i? In a double-blind RCT, 4-year-olds trained on working memory improved on working-memory transfer tasks and those trained on reasoning improved on reasoning transfer tasks, but neither transferred to the unpracticed skill. → Diamond Adele 2011 (2)
Evidence¶
Diamond Adele 2011¶
Diamond Adele, Lee Kathleen. (2011). Interventions shown to Aid Executive Function Development in Children 4–12 Years Old. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204529
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review reports a computerized inhibition-training study in which gains appeared on only 2 of 3 practiced games "with no transfers to un-practiced tasks."
"Using the same dosage, duration, and frequency as CogMed© studies, improvements in 4 and 6-year-olds were found on only 2 of the 3 inhibition games practiced, with no transfers to un-practiced tasks (13)."
Diamond Adele 2011 (2)¶
Diamond Adele, Lee Kathleen. (2011). Interventions shown to Aid Executive Function Development in Children 4–12 Years Old. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204529
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review describes a double-blind randomized-control trial with multiple training- and transfer-tasks in 4-year-olds; transfer was skill-specific and "Transfers were narrow."
"Those trained on working memory improved more on working-memory transfer tasks than did controls and those trained in reasoning improved more on reasoning transfer tasks than controls (12). Neither group showed transfer to the un-practiced skill"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Computer-based training reliably improves children's working memory and reasoning, but computerized training has not succeeded in improving 4- to 6-year-olds' inhibitory control — reports the opposite
- CogMed computerized working-memory training improves practiced working-memory skills with narrow transfer, and controls playing the same games without increasing difficulty show no gains — a broader claim this one bears on
- Transfer from computer-based working-memory and reasoning training in children is narrow: gains stay within the trained domain — a broader claim this one bears on
- Explicit transfer instructions, in which trainees discuss how trained strategies could apply to a new task, produced reliable transfer of imagery and sentence-generation training to unpracticed text learning in older adults — related
- EF training demands must keep increasing as children improve, or few gains will be seen — related
- Digitalised task training shows highly inconsistent evidence, appearing particularly suited to improving working memory — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
computer-training-inhibition-limited-transfer-narrow |
title |
Computerized training of inhibition in young children shows limited success, and a randomized trial found narrow, skill-specific transfer of working-memory and reasoning training in 4-year-olds |
description |
Computerized training of inhibition in young children shows limited success, and a randomized trial found narrow, skill-specific transfer of working-memory and reasoning training in 4-year-olds |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2011 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — diamond-adele-2011, diamond-adele-2011-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.