Claims

Computer-based training reliably improves children's working memory and reasoning, but computerized training has not succeeded in improving 4- to 6-year-olds' inhibitory control

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q2 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Cogmed computerized working-memory training improves working memory even on untrained tasks, with gains persisting 6 months and delayed math gains appearing 6 months after training. → Diamond Adele 2012 q2 i0 Attempts to improve 4- to 6-year-olds' inhibitory control with computerized inhibitory-control games or training have not been successful, whereas 9-year-olds improved in task switching and inhibition after computer-based task-switching training. → Diamond Adele 2012 (2)

Evidence

Diamond Adele 2012

Diamond Adele. (2012). Activities and Programs That Improve Children's Executive Functions. Current Directions in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412453722

q2 · i? · review · r2

Narrative review of computerized-training studies; the review reports Cogmed as the most researched approach, repeatedly successful, with two studies (Holmes et al., 2009, 2010) finding working-memory gains remained 6 months after training and math gains evident 6 months later despite no immediate gains.

"When Cogmed training is on working memory, working memory improves even on untrained tasks (e.g., Klingberg et al., 2005; Thorell et al., 2009)."

Diamond Adele 2012 (2)

Diamond Adele. (2012). Activities and Programs That Improve Children's Executive Functions. Current Directions in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412453722

q2 · i0 · review · r2

Narrative review reporting failed computerized inhibitory-control training in 4- to 6-year-olds (Rueda et al., 2005 found no EF improvements), while 9-year-olds receiving task-switching training improved in both task switching and inhibition (Karbach & Kray, 2009).

"attempts thus far to improve 4- to 6-year-olds' inhibitory control using computerized inhibitory-control games or training have not been successful (Rueda, Rothbart, McCandliss, Saccomanno, & Posner, 2005; Thorell et al., 2009)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id computerized-training-wm-reasoning-not-young-inhibition
title Computer-based training reliably improves children's working memory and reasoning, but computerized training has not succeeded in improving 4- to 6-year-olds' inhibitory control
description Computer-based training reliably improves children's working memory and reasoning, but computerized training has not succeeded in improving 4- to 6-year-olds' inhibitory control
status review
evidence_strength mixed
newest_evidence 2012
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — diamond-adele-2012, diamond-adele-2012-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.