Age did not interact with associative relatedness or effective encoding-strategy use in predicting JOLs, indicating no age differences in the use of these two sources of information when making judgments of learning¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Both relatedness and use of effective encoding strategies positively influenced JOLs, and age did not interact with either predictor. → Hertzog C 2011
Evidence¶
Hertzog C 2011¶
Hertzog C, Dunlosky J. (2011). Metacognition in Later Adulthood: Spared Monitoring Can Benefit Older Adults' Self-regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3903298/
q2 · i? · review · r2
Multilevel modeling analysis of item relatedness and reported encoding-strategy use on JOLs in the cross-sectional paired-associate study; the article reports that "age did not interact with relatedness or strategy use in predicting JOLs."
"Both relatedness and the use of effective encoding strategies positively influenced JOLs. Most important, age did not interact with relatedness or strategy use in predicting JOLs, indicating no age differences in the use of these two sources of information when making JOLs."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Aging does not materially reduce the relative accuracy (resolution) of judgments of learning during encoding, with cross-sectional evidence of no age declines and even age-related increases in aggregate JOL resolution across ages 18 to 81 — related
- Backward-associated word pairs produce a foresight bias: judgments of learning are inflated relative to actual recall when the dominant association runs from target to cue — related
- Delaying judgments of learning after study markedly reduces, but does not eliminate, the foresight bias — related
- Drawing quality predicted JOLs to a similar extent in both drawing conditions, contrary to the expectation that scaffolds would strengthen this cue use — related
- Training metacognitive self-regulation (self-testing plus selective restudy) produced greater paired-associate learning improvements in older adults than traditional encoding-strategy training when study was self-paced — related
- Monitoring judgments are positively associated with learning outcomes (β = 0.29) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-age-difference-jol-information-sources |
title |
Age did not interact with associative relatedness or effective encoding-strategy use in predicting JOLs, indicating no age differences in the use of these two sources of information when making judgments of learning |
description |
Age did not interact with associative relatedness or effective encoding-strategy use in predicting JOLs, indicating no age differences in the use of these two sources of information when making judgments of learning |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2011 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — hertzog-c-2011 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.