Self-perceived TPACK-21 domain scores do not differ significantly by faculty age group or appointment type¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? One-way ANOVAs found no statistically significant differences across any TPACK domain by age group (all p > .05, η² ≤ .05) or by career type (all p > .05, η² ≤ .01). → Sutedjo A 2026
Evidence¶
Sutedjo A 2026¶
Sutedjo A, Chowdhury M and Liu SP (2026) Assessing faculty self-perceived knowledge in using generative AI to teach 21st-century skills. Front. Educ. 11:1913310. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1913310
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Age-group ANOVAs (Tables 5) and career-type ANOVAs (Table 6) in the 127-faculty survey; career-type effect sizes were "negligible to small (η² ≤ .01)". Equivalence was not tested; only non-significance reported.
"The analyses indicated no statistically significant differences across any of the TPACK domains (p > .05). Effect sizes were uniformly small (η² ≤ .05), suggesting minimal practical variation in technological, pedagogical, content, or integrated knowledge across age groups."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Age and Developmental Stage — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Faculty report high self-perceived knowledge in traditional TPACK domains but substantially lower self-perceived knowledge in technology-integrated GenAI domains — related
- Gender, age and English proficiency show nuanced group differences in chatbot attitudes and concerns — related
- Perceived learning outcomes differ across grades only in the skill application dimension, with first-year students scoring significantly higher than second-year students — related
- Teaching experience does not significantly enhance MTES AI-TPACK proficiency, though experienced MTES scored slightly higher on every variable — related
- AI-TPACK component scores show no significant differences across MTES grades, while self-efficacy and teaching beliefs do differ — related
- Earlier and mid-career teachers report more positive AI perceptions than teachers with 21 or more years of experience, except in personal experiences — related
- Male faculty report modestly higher self-perceived GenAI knowledge than female faculty in TK and TPK, with small effect sizes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-age-or-career-type-differences-tpack-genai |
title |
Self-perceived TPACK-21 domain scores do not differ significantly by faculty age group or appointment type |
description |
Self-perceived TPACK-21 domain scores do not differ significantly by faculty age group or appointment type |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — sutedjo-a-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.