Claims

No included systematic review reported outcomes on nurses' practice change (Kirkpatrick level 3), so the transfer of e-learning to practice remains unknown

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? No outcomes related to nurses' changes in practice were reported in any of the 22 included SRs, and the review concludes effectiveness regarding transfer to practice and patient outcomes remains unknown. → Rouleau G 2019

Evidence

Rouleau G 2019

Rouleau G, Gagnon MP, Côté J, Payne-Gagnon J, Hudson E, Dubois CA, Bouix-Picasso J. (2019). Effects of E-Learning in a Continuing Education Context on Nursing Care: Systematic Review of Systematic Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed-Studies Reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/15118

q3 · i? · review · r3

Discussion of the Kirkpatrick level 3 synthesis across the 22 included SRs. The review states "We found no SRs that reported outcomes regarding the translation of the content of e-learning interventions into nurses' practice and behavior", while cautioning this is not evidence of no effect.

"We found no SRs that reported outcomes regarding the translation of the content of e-learning interventions into nurses' practice and behavior (ie, evaluation level 3). This finding does not mean that e-learning had no outcomes on practice."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.