Exploratory moderation analyses found no significant moderators (age, gender, SES, baseline self-control, baseline life events) of the life events–self-control relation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? None of the tested interaction effects were significant (ps>0.10) with Bonferroni corrections. → Duckworth 2013
Evidence¶
Duckworth 2013¶
Duckworth, A. L., Kim, B., and Tsukayama, E. (2013). Life stress impairs self-control in early adolescence. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00608
q2 · i? · associational · r3
Exploratory moderator analyses reported in the Limitations section, with results not shown. The article states "none of these interaction effects were significant, ps > 0.10"; no effect sizes are printed.
"We conducted exploratory moderation analyses (results not shown) examining age, gender, socioeconomic status, baseline self-control, and baseline life events (using Bonferroni corrections) within each study and found none of these interaction effects were significant, ps > 0.10"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Intervention effects of SRI did not differ by student background or ability variables — related
- Too few studies exist to draw robust conclusions on moderating factors (age, gender, screen size, dosage, SAMR-based activities) or on whether benefits persist beyond the post-test — related
- Exploratory subgroup and correlation analyses show mostly no significant differences in benefit or experience scores by child and family characteristics — related
- The mediated EC-achievement model is not moderated by children's sex, age, or SES — related
- Negative life events predict rank-order decreases in self-control in early adolescents over time, controlling for baseline self-control and demographics — related
- The discipline–self-control association is similar in magnitude across discipline components, gender, age, region, informant, reliability, and research design — related
- Demographic moderators (child gender, parent gender, ethnicity, sample type, socio-economic status) show limited moderating effects on the self-efficacy–partnership association — related
- Associations with teacher wellbeing are moderated by sample type (in-service vs pre-service) and educational setting, while age and education show nonsignificant associations — related
- Age, gender, developmental status, SES, and sample region do not significantly moderate the inhibitory control–mathematical ability correlation — related
- Background variables (need for cognition, test anxiety, mindset, puzzle experience) showed no consistent moderating patterns across the three experiments — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-moderators-life-events-self-control |
title |
Exploratory moderation analyses found no significant moderators (age, gender, SES, baseline self-control, baseline life events) of the life events–self-control relation |
description |
Exploratory moderation analyses found no significant moderators (age, gender, SES, baseline self-control, baseline life events) of the life events–self-control relation |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — duckworth-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.