Claims

No significant difference in mathematics achievement due to gender among third graders

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The gender effect on posttest achievement was not statistically significant (sig. 0.773, effect size 0.001). → Yaghmour 2016

Evidence

Yaghmour 2016

Kholoud Subhi Yaghmour. (2016). Effectiveness of Blended Teaching Strategy on the Achievement of Third Grade Students in Mathematics. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.5. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092394

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Two Way ANCOVA on posttest achievement of 97 third graders: gender F = 0.084, sig. 0.773, effect size 0.001 — not significant at α=0.05. The author ascribes this to blended teaching decreasing achievement differences between the classes and to equivalent efforts by male and female students.

"the sig. of the gender va riable (male, and female) was (0.773), which is hig her than (α=0.05), which indicates the lack of signific ant difference between the means of the performance of the participants of the study in the items of the achievement posttest ascribed to the variable of gender"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.