Claims

No significant gender difference in Arabic oral skills gains when both groups are taught with VTM or traditional methods

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? ANCOVA found no statistically significant difference in post-test oral skills scores attributed to gender (F=.180, sig=.674). → Nail M. Alhajya 2018

Evidence

Nail M. Alhajya 2018

Nail M. Alhajya, Sumaia S. Alzaghamim, Yousef M. Arouri. (2018). THE IMPACT OF VIRTUAL TRIPS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARABIC LANGUAGE ORAL SKILLS AMONG THIRD GRADE STUDENTS IN JORDAN. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(1), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.331

q3 · i? · causal · r2

ANCOVA on the same 48-student quasi-experiment tested the gender main effect on post-test scores. Descriptive means showed experimental males at 36.9 and females at 38.41 versus control males at 26.50 and females at 23.35, but the gender effect was not significant. No effect size is printed; equivalence was not tested.

"Table 2 indicates that there weren’t statistically significant differences at the level of α=0.05 in the development of Arabic oral skills among the third graders between experimental group and the control in the post-test according to gender variable. The value of F= .180 and sig= .674"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.