Claims

No significant gender difference in mathematics achievement within the performance-assessment experimental group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Male and female students in the experimental group did not differ significantly in post-test mathematics achievement (M = 45.6 vs M = 40.8), t(39) = .82, p = .42. → Ato Kwamina Arhin & Adelaide Koryoe Offoe 2015

Evidence

Ato Kwamina Arhin & Adelaide Koryoe Offoe 2015

Ato Kwamina Arhin & Adelaide Koryoe Offoe. (2015). Gender Differences and mathematics Achievement of Senior High School Students: A Case of Ghana National College. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.33. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083493

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Within-experimental-group comparison of male (M = 45.6, SD = 16.6) and female (M = 40.8, SD = 22.7) post-test scores using a t-test at alpha .05; the null hypothesis was retained. No effect size is printed, so the finding is a non-detection, not a measured null effect.

"The result of the paired sample t-test shows that t here is no statistically significant difference in the mathematics achievement between male and female students from the experimental group (M = 45.6, SD = 1 6.6), (M = 40.8, SD = 22.7), t (39) = .82, p= .42."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.