Male and female experimental groups did not differ significantly in reading comprehension at post-test after Telegram instruction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? At post-test, male (M=16.65, SD=2.51) and female experimental students showed no significant difference in reading comprehension, t(53)=2.241, p=.092. → Naderi 2018
Evidence¶
Naderi 2018¶
Naderi, S., & Akrami, A. (2018). EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension Development through MALL: Telegram Groups in Focus. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 339-350. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11223a
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Independent-samples t-test on post-test scores of the male and female Telegram experimental groups. No effect size is printed; the p-value of .092 is near the .05 threshold but the article reports it as non-significant.
"there was no significant difference [t (53) = 2.241, p = .092 (two-tailed)] between the mean scores of the male (M=16.65, SD=2.51) and female (M=15.83, SD=2.91) in reading comprehension ability at the post-test."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Gender — predictor: outcomes differ by group: a gap reflecting circumstances and treatment, not a cause
Related Claims¶
- No significant difference in organic chemistry post-test achievement between male and female students irrespective of instructional method — related
- Among students taught with portfolio assessment, post-test geography performance did not differ significantly by gender — related
- Male and female students taught Igbo language reading comprehension with the cloze approach do not differ significantly in achievement — related
- No significant gender difference in performance among undergraduates taught with blended learning — related
- No significant gender difference in performance among undergraduates exposed to e-learning — related
- Gender shows no significant difference in inferring word meanings between experimental and control groups — related
- Gender shows no significant difference in reading comprehension achievement between experimental and control groups in the Ekiti quasi-experiment — related
- No significant gender difference in mathematics achievement within the performance-assessment experimental group — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.