A single experiment-based session within a lecture-dominated course produces no significant overall learning gains on a post-experiment questionnaire¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Total scores on the post-experiment questionnaire did not differ significantly between the experiment group and the lecture-only control group. → Nirupama Devaraj and Jaishankar Raman 2014
q2 i? In the regression controlling for student characteristics, participating in the experiment had a negative impact on total score, significant at the 10% level in Model 2. → Nirupama Devaraj and Jaishankar Raman 2014
Evidence¶
Nirupama Devaraj and Jaishankar Raman 2014¶
Nirupama Devaraj and Jaishankar Raman. (2014). The Effect of Student Learning Styles, Race and Gender on Learning Outcomes: The Case of Public Goods. Journal of Learning in Higher Education, Fall 2014 (Volume 10 Issue 2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1143339
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Quasi-experiment comparing 84 students in three experiment-treatment macro sections with 28 students in a lecture-based micro control section, assessed on six public-goods multiple-choice questions. The article reports "no significant impact on the learning outcomes" in total points, and a negative experiment effect significant at the 10% level in Model 2.
"We find that experiment based learning has no significant impact on the learning outcomes as measured by the total points scored by a student in the post experiment questionnaire."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Experiment-based learning is most effective when adopted as the dominant course strategy rather than an occasional technique — a broader claim this one bears on
- Multifaceted EBP interventions combining lectures, computer sessions, small-group discussions, journal clubs, and assignments were more likely to improve knowledge, skills, and attitudes than single interventions or no intervention — a broader claim this one bears on
- A longitudinal multifaceted EBM curriculum for medical students significantly increased Berlin questionnaire and Fresno test knowledge scores over two and three years — related
- A multifaceted EBM course for medical students produced a mean pre-post Fresno test difference of 92.8 points (P<0.001) — related
- A multifaceted EBM course for pharmacy students significantly improved overall EBM test scores (11.4 vs. 12.6, P<0.0001) — related
- Medical students who received multifaceted EBM training and searched PubMed or Medline more than three times per week increased from 9.7% to 31.7% (P<0.001) — related
- Both the flipped-learning group and the lecture-based control group showed statistically significant within-group gains from pre-test to post-test — related
- Cooperative learning produced significantly higher overall learning motivation than lecture-based teaching in a nine-week Vietnamese higher education course — related
- A longitudinal small-group EBM intervention improved medical students' overall attitudes and skills scores across three assessment points over 15 months — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.