Non-symbolic magnitude processing shows mixed associations with inhibition measures¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The association between inhibition and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing was not univocal: an association appeared with the non-numerical stroop task but not with the numerical stroop task. → Bellon E 2016
Evidence¶
Bellon E 2016¶
Bellon E, Fias W and De Smedt B (2016) Are Individual Differences in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval in Children Related to Inhibition? Front. Psychol. 7:825. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00825
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Exploratory correlational analysis in 86 third graders testing whether domain-general inhibition explains non-symbolic task performance; the non-numerical stroop also associated with symbolic processing, but these associations did not explain the magnitude-processing–fact-retrieval link.
"However, the results on the association between inhibition and the non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing task were not so univocal. We observed an association with the non-numerical stroop task, but found no association with the numerical stroop task."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Number Sense — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Teacher-rated inhibition (BRIEF) does not correlate with stroop-based cognitive inhibition measures — related
- Children with developmental dyscalculia are more susceptible to task-irrelevant information than controls across five experiments — related
- Symbolic numerical magnitude processing is a powerful unique predictor of arithmetic fact retrieval — related
- Adults with DD show a reduced Number Stroop effect during physical comparison, suggesting weaker automatic activation of number magnitude — related
- Adults with DD show deficient time/duration processing but preserved length processing, with mixed findings across studies — related
- No significant independent relationship was found between inhibition and factual knowledge of arithmetic in either children or adults — related
- Adults with dyslexia without dyscalculia show no deficit in nonsymbolic numerical magnitude processing
- Working memory and symbolic number processing are both linked to adult arithmetic and numeracy, replicating prior research — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
nonsymbolic-nmp-mixed-inhibition-association |
title |
Non-symbolic magnitude processing shows mixed associations with inhibition measures |
description |
Non-symbolic magnitude processing shows mixed associations with inhibition measures |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2016 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — bellon-e-2016 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.