Claims

All three facets of decision-making competence improved from pre- to post-intervention at the omnibus level

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Omnibus ANCOVA showed pre-to-post improvements in value assessment (F = 28.1), belief assessment (F = 8.41), and information integration (F = 8.8), all p < 0.0001. → Zwilling 2019

Evidence

Zwilling 2019

Zwilling, C. E., Daugherty, A. M., Hillman, C. H., Kramer, A. F., Cohen, N. J. & Barbey, A. K. (2019). Enhanced decision-making through multimodal training. npj Science of Learning 4:11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-019-0049-x

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Omnibus ANCOVA results for the three A-DMC facets in the RCT; all remained significant at a Bonferroni corrected threshold of 0.017. Groups did not differ at pre-intervention on any facet (all p > 0.49).

"At the omnibus level, all three facets of decision-making competence demonstrated improvements from pre- to post-intervention (value assessment: F = 28.1, p < 0.0001,d f = (4,132); belief assessment: F = 8.41, p<0.0001,d f = (4,132); information integration: F = 8.8, p < 0.0001,d f = (4,132); see Table 4)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.