Some outcome-oriented PSMTs (types o and o) predict single-trial outcomes, and type o thinkers conflate causality with conditionality¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer2·q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Type o and o* thinkers interpreted probability questions as asking when or how a favourable outcome would occur, made yes-no predictions, and o* thinkers assumed a causal relationship between conditioning event and outcome. The third outcome-oriented subgroup, o**, used experimental probability without these biases. → Elbehary 2021
Evidence¶
Elbehary 2021¶
Elbehary, S.G.A. (2021). Reasoning under uncertainty within the context of probability education: A case study of preservice mathematics teachers. Pythagoras, 42(1), a630. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v42i1.630
q2 · i? · qualitative · r2
Qualitative analysis of giving-birth and die responses. The article reports o/o* thinkers focused on the outcome rather than its probability, mirroring Konold's (1989) outcome-oriented description, and that o* thinkers were 'less conscious of the distinction between causality and conditionality'.
"Consequently, type o* thinkers share the causal conception since they assumed a causal relationship at which the conditioning event B is the cause and A is the consequence"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Statistical Reasoning — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Attributing outcomes to Allah's will among some PSMTs functioned as probabilistic reasoning, not mere personalist belief — related
- Mathematically oriented PSMTs exhibit equiprobability and insensitivity-to-prior-probability biases — related
- A bias-free experimental-probability subcategory (o**) emerged only in the die-rolling task — related
- Subjectively oriented reasoning emerged in the giving-birth context but disappeared in the die-rolling task — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
outcome-oriented-causal-conception |
title |
Some outcome-oriented PSMTs (types o and o*) predict single-trial outcomes, and type o* thinkers conflate causality with conditionality |
description |
Some outcome-oriented PSMTs (types o and o*) predict single-trial outcomes, and type o* thinkers conflate causality with conditionality |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
recheck_by |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-25 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — elbehary-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.