Students taught with the scientific approach based learning program (P2BPS) achieve better generic science skills than students taught conventionally in general physics II¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Posttest generic science skills means were significantly higher in the P2BPS experimental class than in the conventionally taught control class (sig. 0.000). → Wahyuni and Amdani 2016

Evidence¶

Wahyuni and Amdani 2016¶

Ida Wahyuni, Khairul Amdani. (2016). Influence Based Learning Program Scientific Learning Approach to Science Students Generic Skills. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.32. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1122435

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment with two-group pretest-posttest design in general physics II at State University of Medan; the t-test of posttest generic science skills means gave "sig. 0,000 less than 0.05", so the difference favoring the P2BPS class was accepted as significant. No effect size is printed.

"Hypothesis test results mean KGS posttest with different test average values obtained sig. 0,000 less than 0.05, so Ha is received."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Physics students taught with the Inquiry Training model based on JITT show higher problem-solving ability than students taught with cooperative learning in General Physics II — related
• Students taught with the Target-Task Problem-Solving Model significantly outperformed lecture-method students on the Performance Test on Current Electricity — a broader claim this one bears on
• Posttest generic science skills reached a high category in the P2BPS class and only a sufficient category in the control class — a narrower finding that bears on this claim