Limited device access and a six-month engagement constrained some Board members' contributions, with one member reporting expectations were not met¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2025: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Procurement delays meant advisors lacked devices in phase one, and one Board member disagreed they were provided meaningful collaboration opportunities. → limitations-1
Evidence¶
limitations-1¶
Pautz Stephenson, S., Banks, R., & Coenraad, M. (2022, June). Outcomes of increased practitioner engagement in edtech development: How strong, sustainable research-practice-industry partnerships will build a better edtech future. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/158
q2 · i? · design · r2
From the Opportunities for Improvement section of the six-month preliminary report. While most practitioners found activities consistent with expectations, some felt that not having access to the device limited their experience and ability to contribute. No effect size printed.
"One person, however, indicated they disagreed with this and indicated that they disagreed with the statement that they were provided with meaningful opportunities for collaboration. One Board member indicated they were not able to help Merlyn Mind refine their product based on real-world settings."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Industry partners reported learning about working with schools and educators, including contracting and teacher community building — related
- All six Practitioner Advisory Board members reported that engaging with Merlyn Mind was a valuable use of their time and that their feedback was taken seriously — reports the opposite
- Practitioner Advisory Board members reported learning more about AI and related edtech through their engagement — related
- Educator involvement in choosing a pilot tool is associated with higher engagement and implementation fidelity, while lack of autonomy contributed to low usage and negative feelings — related
- Participants reported professional growth through networking and collaboration within the RPIP — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
pab-device-access-limitations |
title |
Limited device access and a six-month engagement constrained some Board members' contributions, with one member reporting expectations were not met |
description |
Limited device access and a six-month engagement constrained some Board members' contributions, with one member reporting expectations were not met |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
recheck_by |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — limitations-1 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.